The application of Kirkwood-Buff theory to study hydration properties of α-amino acids
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5488/CMP.29.13801Keywords:
amino acid, apparent molar volume, standard molar volume, hydration number, integral equation, Kirkwood-Buff theoryAbstract
Protein conformational stability and function depend on non-covalent interactions that are strongly influenced by the surrounding environment. To explore protein properties, amino acids are often utilized as model systems. In this study, we determined the densities of seven α-amino acids in aqueous solutions between 278.15 K and 308.15 K and calculated the apparent molar volumes. Linear extrapolation yielded standard molar volumes, which were analyzed to characterize amino-acid hydration. The contributions of side chains to the standard molar volume were determined relative to glycine. The standard molar volume increased with temperature, indicating reduced electrostriction of water around the amino acids, consistent with lower hydration numbers at higher temperatures. We employed the Ornstein-Zernike integral equation with hypernetted-chain closure and a coarse-grained Lennard-Jones bead model to calculate pair correlation functions and Kirkwood-Buff integrals, from which standard molar volumes were obtain. The model reproduced the experimental standard molar volumes very well.
References
Yan Z., Wang J., Kong W., Lu J., Fluid Phase Equilib., 2004, 215, 143–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2003.07.001
Panuszko A., Nowak M. G., Bruździak P., Stasiulewicz M., Stangret J., J. Mol. Liq., 2019, 278, 706–715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.01.086
Bagchi B., In: Water in Biological and Chemical Processes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013, 117–134.
Zhao H., Biophys. Chem., 2006, 122, 157–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpc.2006.03.008
Jolicoeur C., Riedl B., Desrochers D., Lemelin L. L., Zamojska R., Enea O., J. Solution Chem., 1986, 15, 109–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00646283
Mota P. C., Ferreira O., Hnědkovský L., Pinho S. P., Cibulka I., J. Solution Chem., 2014, 43, 283–297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-014-0127-x
Banipal T. S., Kaur J., Banipal P. K., J. Chem. Thermodyn., 2012, 48, 181–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jct.2011.12.012
Riyazuddeen, Gazal U., J. Chem. Eng. Data, 2012, 57, 1468–1473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/je300083m
Mallick B. C., Kishore N., J. Solution Chem., 2006, 35, 1441–1451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-006-9070-9
Rajagopal K., Edwin Gladson S., J. Solution Chem., 2012, 41, 646–679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-012-9820-9
Iulian O., Stefaniu A., J. Solution Chem., 2013, 42, 676–689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-013-9976-y
Romero C. M., Esteso M. A., Trujillo G. P., J. Chem. Eng. Data, 2018, 63, 4012–4019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.8b00236
Rodríguez D. M., Romero C. M., J. Mol. Liq., 2017, 233, 487–498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.02.118
Lumb J. R., Mol. Cell. Biochem., 1987, 73, 91–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00219423
Baran L., Sokołowski S., J. Chem. Phys., 2017, 147, 044903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4994919
Zielkiewicz J., J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 1998, 94, 1713–1719. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/a800943k
Henderson D., Sokołowski S., Borowko M., In: Computational Methods in Surface and Colloid Science, CRC Press, 2000, 135–165.
Vergara A., Paduano L., Capuano F., Sartorio R., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2002, 4, 4716–4720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/B204795K
Matteoli E. J., Phys. Chem. B, 1997, 101, 9800–9810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9720000
Pierce V., Kang M., Aburi M., Weerasinghe S., Smith P.E., Cell Biochem. Biophys., 2008, 50, 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-007-9005-0
Sirotkin V. A., Komissarov I. A., Khadiullina A. V., J. Phys. Chem. B, 2012, 116, 4098–4105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jp300726p
Nakayoshi T., Kato K., Fukuyoshi S., Takahashi O., Kurimoto E., Oda A., Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2021, 22, 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22020509
Millero F. J., Ward G. K., Lepple F. K., Hoff E. V., J. Phys. Chem., 1974, 78, 1636–1643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/j100609a008
Millero F. J., Lo Surdo A., Shin C., J. Phys. Chem., 1978, 82, 784–792. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/j100496a007
Berlin E., Pallansch M. J., J. Phys. Chem., 1968, 72, 1887–1889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/j100852a004
Ben-Naim A., J. Chem. Phys., 2008, 128, 234501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2938859
Berendsen H. J. C., Grigera J. R., Straatsma T. P., J. Phys. Chem., 1987, 91, 6269–6271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/j100308a038
Blanco M. A., Sahin E., Robinson A. S., Roberts C. J., J. Phys. Chem. B, 2013, 117, 16013–16028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jp409300j
Imai T., Kinoshita M., Hirata F., J. Chem. Phys., 2000, 112, 9469–9478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.481565
Shulgin I. L., Ruckenstein E., J. Chem. Phys., 2005, 123, 054909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2011388
Simon J.-M., Krüger P., Schnell S. K., Vlugt T. J. H., Kjelstrup S., Bedeaux D., J. Chem. Phys., 2022, 157, 130901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0106162
Germann M. W., Turner T., Allison S. A., J. Phys. Chem. A, 2007, 111, 1452–1455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jp068217o
D’Amico F., Bencivenga F., Camisasca G., Gessini A., Principi E., Cucini R., Masciovecchio C., J. Chem. Phys., 2013, 139, 015101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812283
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Z. Štefanič, B. Hribar-Lee

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







