How does ethane wet different substrates?

Authors

  • Ł. Baran Department of Theoretical Chemistry, Institute of Chemical Sciences, Faculty of Chemistry, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin, Lublin, Poland; Departamento de Química Física, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Complutense, Madrid 28040, Spain https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1777-1998
  • D. Tarasewicz Department of Theoretical Chemistry, Institute of Chemical Sciences, Faculty of Chemistry, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin, Lublin, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4010-9591
  • W. Rżysko Department of Theoretical Chemistry, Institute of Chemical Sciences, Faculty of Chemistry, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin, Lublin, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9806-6056

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5488/CMP.29.13603

Keywords:

surface phase transitions, computer simulations, adsorption

Abstract

Computer simulations are employed to investigate the adsorption mechanisms of ethane on both homogeneous and inhomogeneous substrates. For homogeneous surfaces, the full range of surface phase transitions—from incomplete to complete wetting — can be accessed by tuning the strength of the surface potential. The resulting layering transition temperatures show excellent agreement with experimental measurements of ethane on graphite. By contrast, although all inhomogeneous substrates exhibit a prewetting transition, the adsorption mechanisms are strongly influenced by the stripe width.

References

Arjmandi A., Bi H., Nielsen S. U., Dam-Johansen K., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2024, 16, No. 43, 58006–58028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.4c09729

Ejenstam L., Ovaskainen L., Rodriguez-Meizoso I., Wågberg L., Pan J., Swerin A., Claesson P. M., J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2013, 412, 56–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2013.09.006

Kalliorinne K., Hindér G., Sandberg J., Holmberg H.-C., Larsson R., Almqvist A., Friction, 2025, 13, No. 9, 9441069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26599/FRICT.2025.9441069

Bergeron V., Bonn D., Martin J. Y., Vovelle L., Nature, 2000, 405, No. 6788, 772–775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35015525

Bertrand E., Bonn D., Broseta D., Dobbs H., Indekeu J., Meunier J., Ragil K., Shahidzadeh N., J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 2002, 33, No. 1, 217–222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-4105(01)00191-7

Bonn D., Eggers J., Indekeu J., Meunier J., Rolley E., Rev. Mod. Phys., 2009, 81, 739–805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.739

de Gennes P. G., Rev. Mod. Phys., 1985, 57, 827–863. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.57.827

Young T., Phil. Trans. R. Soc., 1805, 95, 65–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1805.0005

Gibbs J. W., Trans. Conn. Acad. Arts Sci., 1874–1878, 3, 108–248, 343–524.

Freundlich H., Z. Phys. Chem., 1907, 57U, No. 1, 385–470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zpch-1907-5723

Langmuir I., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1918, 40, No. 9, 1361–1403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ja02242a004

Brunauer S., Emmett P. H., Teller E., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1938, 60, No. 2, 309–319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01269a023

Cahn J. W., J. Chem. Phys., 1977, 66, No. 8, 3667–3672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.434402

Ebner C., Saam W. F., Phys. Rev. Lett., 1977, 38, 1486–1489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.38.1486

Pandit R., Schick M., Wortis M., Phys. Rev. B, 1982, 26, 5112–5140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.26.5112

Binder K., Landau D. P., Phys. Rev. B, 1988, 37, 1745–1765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.37.1745

Nham H. S., Hess G. B., Phys. Rev. B, 1988, 38, 5166–5169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.38.5166

Kruchten F., Knorr K., Volkmann U. G., Taub H., Hansen F. Y., Matthies B., Herwig K. W., Langmuir, 2005, 21, No. 16, 7507–7512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/la050338c

Kellay H., Bonn D., Meunier J., Phys. Rev. Lett., 1993, 71, 2607–2610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.2607

Taborek P., Rutledge J. E., Phys. Rev. Lett., 1992, 68, 2184–2187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.2184

Ross D., Bonn D., Posazhennikova A. I., Indekeu J. O., Meunier J., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2001, 87, 176103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.176103

Rafaï S., Bonn D., Bertrand E., Meunier J., Weiss V. C., Indekeu J. O., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2004, 92, 245701. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.245701

Patrykiejew A., Sokołowski S., Binder K., Surf. Sci. Rep., 2000, 37, No. 6, 207–344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5729(99)00011-4

Patrykiejew A., Sokolowski S., Pizio O., In: Surface and Interface Science: Solid-Gas Interfaces II, Wandelt K. (Ed.), Wiley, 2016, 883–1253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527680580.ch46

Dąbrowska K., Pizio O., Sokołowski S., Condens. Matter Phys., 2022, 25, No. 3, 33603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5488/CMP.25.33603

Bryk P., Korczeniewski E., Szymański G. S., Kowalczyk P., Terpiłowski K., Terzyk A. P., Materials, 2020, 13, No. 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13071554

Terzyk A. P., Bryk P., Korczeniewski E., Kowalczyk P., Zawadzka A., Płóciennik P., Wiśniewski M., Wesołowski R. P., Langmuir, 2019, 35, No. 2, 420–427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03790

Karykowski K., Rżysko W., Patrykiejew A., Sokołowski S., Thin Solid Films, 1994, 249, No. 2, 236–240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6090(94)90768-4

Chmiel C., Karykowski K., Patrykiejew A., Rżysko W., Sokołowski S., Mol. Phys., 1994, 81, No. 3, 691–703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00268979400100461

Chmiel G., Patrykiejew A., Rżysko W., Sokołowski S., Mol. Phys., 1994, 83, No. 1, 19–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00268979400101061

Martin M. G., Siepmann J. I., J. Phys. Chem. B, 1998, 102, No. 14, 2569–2577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jp972543+

Yan Q., de Pablo J. J., J. Chem. Phys., 1999, 111, No. 21, 9509–9516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.480282

Ferrenberg A. M., Swendsen R. H., Phys. Rev. Lett., 1988, 61, 2635–2638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2635

Binder K., Phys. Rev. Lett., 1981, 47, 693–696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.693

Rżysko W., Trokhymchuk A., J. Chem. Phys., 2012, 137, No. 22, 224505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4769983

Benet J., Palanco J. G., Sanz E., MacDowell L. G., J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, No. 38, 22079–22089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jp506534b

MacDowell L. G., Llombart P., Benet J., Palanco J. G., Guerrero-Martinez A., ACS Omega, 2018, 3, No. 1, 112–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b01650

Friend D. G., Ingham H., Fly J. F., J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 1991, 20, No. 2, 275–347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.555881

Ramesh S., Zhang Q., Torzo G., Maynard J. D., Phys. Rev. Lett., 1984, 52, 2375–2378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.2375

Published

2026-03-30

Issue

Section

Special issue dedicated to the 75th anniversary of Prof. Stefan Sokołowski

Categories

How to Cite

[1]
Ł. Baran, D. Tarasewicz, and W. Rżysko, “How does ethane wet different substrates?”, Condens. Matter Phys., vol. 29, no. 1, p. 13603, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.5488/CMP.29.13603.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 93

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.